![]() Feedback that stems from the limited selection aren't really actionable for MS, not because they can't encourage some apps to appear there, but because that feedback really says more about the test itself, rather than the Amazon store experience. This is a tricky survey to interpret, because the current iteration of the Amazon store is so limited in terms of which apps are available for Windows, and the Store is only available to certain insiders. ![]() I understand this wasn't a scientific poll and I typically enjoy the polls Windows Central displays, but this one is a complete mess. ![]() Regadless, the frequent users would probably still have been 20% or less, but the insights could have been much more relevant. There should have been more specification around that term. Lastly, the term "frequently" will have a different meaning for each respondant (multiple times per day, daily, weekly). ![]() or incompatible were actually from non-U.S. How many of the votes that weren't flagged as non-U.S. Segmenting out frequency by usage type (developers) also lowers the total. respondants and those that aren't even capable of using it brings the percentage of frequent users to over 9%. To say that 4.15 % of poll participants use the Amazon App Store apps frequently is true to the poll, but it is not really analyzing the actual usage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |